Classroom Innovation

Classroomization is the act of glorifying something with little reproducibility and branding it as the "Class of Something" to sell dreams to the general public. It's a trend that undermines the scientific element of Innovation and Reproducibility, making it seem like a genius act. However, if we disregard the fact that Classroom Innovation is not inherently innovative, it should be based on scientific methods. tkgshn raises this point here(https://twitter.com/tkgshn/status/1368247175570882561?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw March 6, 2021).

Personally, I strongly dislike the futile act of using such "innovation" as bait to deceive wannabes. It's lame not to be able to say to someone without sense, 'You can't do it, can you?' tkgshn expresses this sentiment here(https://twitter.com/tkgshn/status/1368247435852582913?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw March 6, 2021).

I'm not particularly close to people in the so-called "Entrepreneur Education" industry. Especially those who claim to enhance entrepreneurial spirit and motivation. Because I think it's enough to let motivated and capable people do it intensively. Besides, it's impossible for old-generation teachers with fixed salaries, lifetime employment, and zero entrepreneurial experience to teach it. ttakimoro shares a similar view here(https://twitter.com/ttakimoro/status/1394160364254863363?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw May 17, 2021).

It seems that there is more demand for A player with a vast collection of books tkgshn.icon*3 and Antifragility.

In the context of Entrepreneur Education at universities, teaching overly detailed operational methods that don't require conceptual thinking is meaningless due to the lack of Universality. Focusing solely on memorization without encouraging critical thinking is not Entrepreneur Education, but rather Venture Worker Education. ttakimoro discusses this issue here(https://twitter.com/ttakimoro/status/1398619756538834954?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw May 29, 2021).